Skip to main content
Log in

What factors determine patients’ preference for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy, either intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SQ), demonstrates similar efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The objective of this study was to examine factors influencing patient preference of TNFi. Fifty-nine (79.7%) participants were male with mean age 43.9 years and disease duration of 22.0 years. Fifty-nine patients (79.7%) agreed with the statement ‘My doctor gave me a choice and I made a decision based on my personal preference’. Patients commenced first on IV TNFi most commonly cited reduced frequency of injections (96.6%), administration by a trained professional (89.7%) and use of infusion time for leisure activities (86.2%). Patients commenced on SQ TNFi cited flexibility with timing of treatment (80%), shortened administration time (73.3%) and the convenience of home therapy (73.3%). Shared clinical decision-making between clinicians and patients may be desirable for AS patients commencing TNFi therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W, Gromnica-Ihle E, Kellner H, Krause A, Schneider M, Sorensen H, Zeidler H, Thriene W, Sieper J (2002) Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 359:1187–1193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun J, Sieper J (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 369:1379–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burr ML, Sinnathurai P, Ginawi A, Ostor AJ (2007) Route of administration of biologic therapy: what do patients prefer? Arthritis Rheum 56(suppl):S473

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D (1999) Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 318:318–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis JC Jr, Van Der Heijde D, Braun J, Dougados M, Cush J, Clegg DO, Kivitz A, Fleischmann R, Inman R, Tsuji W (2003) Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (etanercept) for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 48:3230–3236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeWitt EM, Glick HA, Albert DA, Joffe MM, Wolfe F (2006) Medicare coverage of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors as an influence on physicians' prescribing behavior. Arch Intern Med 166:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doward LC, Spoorenberg A, Cook SA, Whalley D, Helliwell PS, Kay LJ, McKenna SP, Tennant A, van der Heijde D, Chamberlain MA (2003) Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones SD, Steiner A, Garrett SL, Calin A (1996) The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). Br J Rheumatol 35:66–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Say RE, Thomson R (2003) The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors. BMJ 327:542–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Dijkmans BA, Braun J, Dougados M, Reveille JD, Wong RL, Kupper H, Davis JC Jr (2006) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:2136–2146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams EL, Edwards CJ (2006) Patient preferences in choosing anti-TNF therapies. Rheumatology 45:1575–1576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Grant support for this study was provided by Schering-Plough Pty Ltd. Schering-Plough neither participated in the conception and design, execution, analysis and interpretation of data nor in the drafting and revising of the article.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Lionel Schachna has received grant support from Schering-Plough Pty Ltd, Wyeth and Abbott Australasia. The other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel Schachna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fajri, D.W., Brand, C.A., Dharmage, S.C. et al. What factors determine patients’ preference for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis?. Clin Rheumatol 28, 599–602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1104-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1104-4

Keywords

Navigation