Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2007;66:235-241
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend


Combination therapy with sulfasalazine and methotrexate is more effective than either drug alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a suboptimal response to sulfasalazine: results from the double-blind placebo-controlled MASCOT study
H. A Capell, R. Madhok, D. R Porter, R. A L Munro, I. B McInnes, J. A Hunter, M. Steven, A. Zoma, E. Morrison, M. Sambrook, F. Wui Poon, R. Hampson, F. McDonald, A. Tierney, N. Henderson, and I. Ford

The 2nd to last paragraph on page 239 should have read as follows and not as published the error is regretted:

The "step-up" approach was used rather than "sustained continuous" or "step-down" regimens, because this approach is often adopted in clinical practice. In a double-blind controlled randomised study, O'Dell et al compared parallel sustained treatment with MTX, SASP and HCQ against MTX alone, and SASP and HCQ in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis.10 11 Low-dose oral prednisolone was permitted in their studies. Although the patients had more severe disease than in the MASCOT study, the results are comparable, as both showed improvement in measures of clinical synovitis, but no difference in ESR as a single measure. O'Dell et al did not report on radiological outcome.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism