Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2006;65:101-104; doi:10.1136/ard.2004.034348
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hein, G
Right arrow Articles by Franke, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hein, G
Right arrow Articles by Franke, S

CONCISE REPORT

Advanced glycation end product modification of bone proteins and bone remodelling: hypothesis and preliminary immunohistochemical findings

G Hein 1, C Weiss 1, G Lehmann 1, T Niwa 2, G Stein 1, S Franke 1

1 Department of Internal Medicine III, Rheumatology and Osteology, Friedrich-Schiller, University Jena, Germany
2 Department of Clinical Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor G Hein
Section of Rheumatology and Osteology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Erlanger Allee 101, D-07740 Jena, Germany; gert.hein{at}med.uni-jena.de


ABSTRACT
Background: The process of bone remodelling is disturbed in the development of osteoporosis.

Objective: To investigate if proteins in osteoporotic bone are modified by advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and whether these alterations are related to measures of bone remodelling based on histomorphometric findings.

Methods: Bone specimens taken from the iliac crest by bone biopsy of eight osteoporotic patients were investigated by histomorphometry and by immunohistochemical staining with the AGEs imidazolone and N{varepsilon}-carboxymethyllysine.

Results: Both AGEs were found in all bone specimens. The intensity of staining correlated with patient age. The percentage of bone surface covered with osteoblasts showed a significantly negative correlation with the staining intensity of both AGEs.

Conclusions: It is known that AGEs can regulate proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells and that AGE-specific binding sites are present in cultured osteoblast-like cells. Moreover, AGE induced biological effects in these cells might be mediated by RAGE (receptor of AGE) or by other AGE receptors in different stages of osteoblast development. The inverse relation between AGE staining intensity and the percentage of bone surface covered with osteoblasts in the trabecular bone may provide evidence that AGE modification of bone proteins disturbs bone remodelling.


Abbreviations: AGE, advanced glycation end product; CML, N{varepsilon}-carboxymethyllysine

Keywords: glycation end products; bone remodelling; histomorphometry; immunohistochenical staining; osteoporosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. SANGUINETI, D. STORACE, F. MONACELLI, A. FEDERICI, and P. ODETTI
Pentosidine Effects on Human Osteoblasts in Vitro
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2008; 1126(1): 166 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. Valcourt, B. Merle, E. Gineyts, S. Viguet-Carrin, P. D. Delmas, and P. Garnero
Non-enzymatic Glycation of Bone Collagen Modifies Osteoclastic Activity and Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5691 - 5703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism